Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julian Ocleppo vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ocleppo vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Ocleppo vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ocleppo 1 - 0 Zima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ocleppo has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 41.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ocleppo, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 44.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ocleppo has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ocleppo has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 12/ 9), with Zima winning 51.92% (W/L 27/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ocleppo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 61/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 61/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Ocleppo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/ 6), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ocleppo winning 1 times and Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ocleppo winning 2 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Ocleppo and Zima was at the M25 Cattolica, 21-06-2023, Second, Clay with Julian Ocleppo getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ocleppo and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ocleppo winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ocleppo winning 1, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ocleppo has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.38 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 134.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ocleppo has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ocleppo has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 41.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
765
Rank
309
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
54% (182-157)
Career Total W/L
55% (158-127)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$7,255
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julian Ocleppo vs Leopold Zima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ocleppo VS Zima
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Julian Ocleppo | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (33/55) | 49% (31/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (26/33) | 65% (20/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (28/63) | 29% (16/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-0 |
Stats 
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Leopold Zima
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julian Ocleppo | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (38/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (341/328) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 116.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (717/1057) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (490/717) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (141/340) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (31/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (335/984) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (18/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Julian Ocleppo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Alexis Gautier
Player
Julian Ocleppo
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Laurent Lokoli
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Matej Dodig
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Julian Ocleppo
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Julian Ocleppo
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Julian Ocleppo
68%
(
75 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Federico Iannaccone
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ocleppo Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ocleppo are available here and Zima photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
